Big spending and anonymous speech

By Scott Mooneyham | Nov 01, 2012

 

RALEIGH -- When Thomas Paine first penned the pamphlet that helped inspire a revolution, he did so anonymously.

Common Sense was initially signed "written by an Englishman."

I suppose that anonymity might provide some justification for the anonymous political speech that we see today, where big campaign donors can hide behind independent expenditure groups.

Paine, though, had a bit more reason to exclude his name from the pamphlet. As a treasonous tract, it might have cost him his head.

A pamphlet of another sort recently crossed my desk via email.

 

It was from the state chapter of the Federalist Society, a group of conservative lawyers and legal scholars that argues for a stricter reading of the law.

 

The report sought to justify increased spending in judicial campaigns, arguing that ...

To continue reading, become a member.
Already a member, please login:

Or, buy a day pass! $0.99.

Buy Now

Or, become a member!

Join Now