McCrory is in a tough position on incentives

By Patrick Gannon | Sep 01, 2014

McCrory in a Tough Position Over Incentives," by Patrick Gannon

RALEIGH – State lawmakers have returned home to their districts for good to campaign for re-election in November. Or have they?

The latest chatter in the capital is about whether House and Senate members will be called back by Gov. Pat McCrory to consider legislation that would result in more state spending on economic incentives to help lure companies to North Carolina. McCrory hasn't tipped his hand about whether he's going to call a special lawmaking session before the Nov. 4elections.

Politically, this isn't an easy decision for the first-term governor and may be one of the toughest of his administration to date. On one hand, his commerce secretary, Sharon Decker, is making the case to her boss to call legislators back. Decker said last week that job recruiters are "in a difficult spot" after the General Assembly's failure in its just-ended session to add more money for the popular Job Development Investment Grants and create a special, flexible fund aimed at closing deals in the latter stages of negotiations with companies. She suggested thousands of jobs are at stake in the coming months if lawmakers don't put more money into the JDIG fund, which could run out of incentives cash in the next couple of months.

"We won't get all of those jobs even with the Job Development Investment Grant, but I can assure you we will get fewer of them if we don't have it," Decker said.

Powerful groups like the N.C. Economic Developers Association, along with a number of lawmakers from both parties, also are pushing for a special session to give job recruiters the incentives they say they need to bring companies to North Carolina. Still others want the Legislature to return to Raleigh to consider extending the current film incentives program and a historic preservation tax credit, both of which are set to expire at year's end.

The incentives debate also comes as the new Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina – a keystone of the McCrory administration – is about to take over job recruiting and other functions of the Commerce Department. The nonprofit partnership is expected to open its doors in Cary in early October. Without incentives, it likely will be more difficult for the organization, which is already under a microscope because of problems with similar groups in other states, to land businesses and create jobs. One lobbyist said starting the new partnership without adequate incentives at its disposal is like forming a Girl Scout troop but denying it cookies.

On the other hand, influential organizations such as the State Employees Association of North Carolina and the conservative group Americans for Prosperity are urging McCrory to resist calls for a special session. AFP's Donald Bryson said last week that North Carolinians "just won't stomach" a special session for the "sole purpose of giving more of taxpayers' hard-earned money to a corporate welfare program." If he calls lawmakers back, McCrory risks alienating a large segment of his conservative base that despises incentives of any kind.

Then again, there's no guarantee that lawmakers will pass anything if they come back, and it could lead to a Republican civil war in the House, a hotbed for clashes on incentives.

Whatever the governor decides, many people won't be happy. But who said governing was easy?

Comments (1)
Posted by: Scott Lilly | Sep 02, 2014 12:01

I'd like to hear how anyone describing themselves as "right-wing, conservative, or Republican" can justify these "incentives".

 

Right-wing:  Equal opportunity rather than equal outcome.  "Incentives" is a government-chosen winner/loser.  Not considered "equal opportunity".

 

Conservative: Favoring good parts of tradition and history.  Bailouts are certainly not traditional by very definition.  Incentives imply something temporary.

 

Republican: Favoring a constitution to limit government.  Taking from the taxpayer more than is "necessary" to give to select businesses is beyond "necessary".

 

So who from the Right-wing, conservative, Republican persuasion can offer how "incentives" can be justified?

 



If you wish to comment, please login.