Nov. 8 reader letters

Nov 07, 2013

Efforts of many will help curb drunk driving

On Friday, Aug. 17, 2012, The Mountaineer ran a story entitled “Off the Hook.”

It was about one of the many DWI cases that prosecutors were being forced to dismiss all across WNC. The case involved a repeat offender who refused to give a breath sample. His blood was drawn, as the law requires.

That blood specimen, and the analyst who tested it, were crucial to the case.

The crime lab in Raleigh was, and still is, understaffed, overwhelmed and under  funded, creating a backlog of thousands of untested specimens, many from WNC.

District Attorneys Mike Bonfoey, Ron Moore and others had expressed their alarm and frustration many times.

The Haywood County DWI Task Force had placed lab issues at the top of its priority list.

The Mountaineer story and a subsequent editorial entitled “Too far away from justice” were picked up by news agencies all over the state, in upstate South Carolina and by several television stations.

I began to receive calls, emails and letters from disbelieving people.

“How could a blood test that takes 20 minutes at the hospital take two years, especially when people are getting killed?”

That this was accepted by anyone was stunning to even people who had no involvement in medicine or law.

That overburdened prosecutors and officers were being forced to go back and re-charge defendants months and years after the crime, when the blood results finally returned was almost unbelievable.

At about the same time of these stories, The Mountaineer began to cover the Angela Woody story.

Angela had been hit by a repeat DWI offender whose blood was sitting in Raleigh, untested, from her most recent DWI arrest in Buncombe County. Angela would eventually pay the ultimate price for WNC not having adequate lab services.

It became, and still is, something of a “joke” in the courtroom, that blood tests were taking up to two years and that analysts had long ago retired or left employment with the lab by the time the case went to court.

Through the continued, relentless and diligent efforts of Mr. Bonfoey, Mr. Moore, the Haywood County DWI Task Force, and the efforts of The Mountaineer to educate the public, help finally came.

Senators Jim Davis and Tom Apodaca introduced and supported Senate Bill 3. Rep. Joe Sam Queen followed with House Bill 39.

These bills allowed for appropriation of funds toward a WNC Crime Lab, 19 new toxicologist positions and for local hospitals to begin testing the blood of DWI suspects for alcohol.

The driving while impaired “industry” will never be the same. Defendants may now get the speedy trial that the 6th Amendment entitles them to.

If they need treatment, the court can mandate it. If jail is the only way to keep them from killing and maiming, the public will be safer, sooner.

I would love to see the story and the editorial re-printed in memory of Angela Woody and others who might never have suffered or died while untested blood specimens sat on a shelf, especially as we are on the eve of the first hospital testing.

Even if that is not possible, I have said before and will say again — your paper has fulfilled the highest duty of journalism by providing the public with facts that help lead us to solutions.

Ellen T. Pitt, MADD WNC

Member Haywood County DWI Task Force

Thanks for the support

To the editor:

Thanks to everyone who supported the band of bears during the first annual papertown marching band festival.

Eleven marching band enjoyed a great day of competition with the band from Apex High School taking the grand champion prize.

Thank you Mr. Stewart and the band of bears for a great day.

Penny Squires

Canton

 

Cartoon was offensive

To the editor:

We take exception to the simplistic, nasty and deceitful political cartoon in the Nov. 1 edition of The Mountaineer.

It shows two men in a bar.  One man says “Obama HAS fundamentally transformed the country.”  The other guy smirkingly says: “So when my unemployment runs out, I went on Disability, and then a glitch gave me unlimited benefits on my food stamp card, so I ransacked a WalMart...”.

The obvious implication of the cartoon is that our country’s culture is being transformed into a bunch of low-income, corrupt takers, always looking for a life-long handout.  What cynical nonsense.

Do some needy folks engage in corruption?  Yes.  Should they be punished?  Absolutely yes.

Are most people at the lowest income levels of our society corrupt?  From our life-long experience in working with the less fortunate — absolutely not.

Now think about the greed involved in the big bank mortgage scandals that cost U.S. taxpayers billions and caused our great national recession.

Think about the world-wide child sex abuse scandal that has rocked the Catholic Church.  Think about the multiple and various scandals over the past few years which involved top-level police officials here in our region.

The moral of this letter?  No segment of society should be defined by the corrupt few.

Blame and punish only the individuals that commit the crimes, and fix whatever problems in the system that make it easy to get away with the crimes.

Rusty and Penny

Wallace

Waynesville

Stand Your Ground defined

To the editor:

“Stand Your Ground” in simple form means “that there is no duty to retreat when a person is immediate jeopardy of life or grave bodily harm, in a place where he or she has a legal right to be and no other options are available.”

If you are legally allowed to carry a firearm, not engaging in criminal activity, not the instigator of the event, nor continued with the event and have the legal right to be where you are then you have no duty under law to retreat from immediate life threatening imminent attack.

It does not mean you can instigate the attack nor go and retrieve a firearm after a fight, that is not imminent, nor does it allow you to carry a firearm illegally. It does not allow you to act unlawfully and commit a unlawful act then attempt to claim self-defense.

In its basic terms “Stand Your Ground” means you can defend yourself or a innocent party with up to and including deadly force if the situation dictates the need, should your life be placed in immediate, unavoidable grave danger and you are the innocent with no ability to flee, why no ability to flee? Because if you could, then you should. Anything else would be murder.”

John Hemingway

WNC CARRY Firearms & Training

Waynesville

Comments (2)
Posted by: Scott Lilly | Nov 07, 2013 15:43

Mr. and Mrs. Wallace,

 

I thought that cartoon was great!  It's humor much like that on a late night show.  While Obama has presided, there had been more unemployment benefits, more disability fraud, and the food stamp program is at an all-time high with that glitch being the pinnacle of it.  The elements of truth make it funny!  (Yes, the argument can be made that it's not entirely Obama's fault.)

 

That being said, anyone who legitimately "needs" benefits ought to be the ones most looking for fraud and abuse and shaming those doing such things publically so that people won't get the wrong idea.  I wrote not too long ago about those that abuse the system and someone replied that because she gets headaches in the sun, she has a right to take half the federal income taxes I pay in the form of "disability" and how dare I look down on her.  Did you consider the opportunity to write the paper to object to how silly that sounded?  How do you "punish" that?  She's depending on the State and it's all "legit"!  She's still out there sitting in a dark house I guess enjoying the fruits of my labor admittedly wearing a large hat and sunglasses when she cuts her lawn and ventures around town.  I don't think she even said, "thank you".  As long as she is alive, half of my federal taxes will support her instead of building roads, defending our shores, or paying off our debt.  And maybe that's the difference between "makers" and "takers".  If that kind of illness effected me, I'd be looking for a night job or a job using a computer/phone in the "required" dark house or something -- not giving up and demanding someone pay me for my condition.

 

As conservative as I am, I like a society that has a very limited safety net for those that legitimately need it -- but not able to be abused and as a way of life... which was the point of the humorous cartoon.

 

Sigh.

 



Posted by: Allen Alsbrooks | Nov 12, 2013 19:36

I, too, thought the cartoon was close to the mark and quite funny. Some find the truth funny while others find it offensive. So life goes.



If you wish to comment, please login.